Skip to content

Posts tagged ‘The Coders’

Home Health Conditions for Payment

We have looked and have been unable to find specific guidance on the new CoPs.  There was a phone conference scheduled with NGS that was cancelled and nothing so far from Palmetto GBA.  Help us out if you know anything.

Meanwhile, some people who are very knowledgeable and well respected in the industry differ from us in how we interpret what ‘estimating how much longer the patient will be on service at the time of recertification’ means.  Look for it below in larger bold text.

§424.22   Requirements for home health services.

Medicare Part A or Part B pays for home health services only if a physician certifies and recertifies the content specified in paragraphs (a)(1) and (b)(2) of this section, as appropriate.

(a) Certification—(1) Content of certification. As a condition for payment of home health services under Medicare Part A or Medicare Part B, a physician must certify the patient’s eligibility for the home health benefit, as outlined in sections 1814(a)(2)(C) and 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Act, as follows in paragraphs (a)(1)(i) through (v) of this section. The patient’s medical record, as specified in paragraph (c) of this section, must support the certification of eligibility as outlined in paragraph (a)(1)(i) through (v) of this section.

(i) The individual needs or needed intermittent skilled nursing care, or physical therapy or speech-language pathology services as defined in §409.42(c) of this chapter. If a patient’s underlying condition or complication requires a registered nurse to ensure that essential non-skilled care is achieving its purpose, and necessitates a registered nurse be involved in the development, management, and evaluation of a patient’s care plan, the physician will include a brief narrative describing the clinical justification of this need. If the narrative is part of the certification form, then the narrative must be located immediately prior to the physician’s signature. If the narrative exists as an addendum to the certification form, in addition to the physician’s signature on the certification form, the physician must sign immediately following the narrative in the addendum.

(ii) Home health services are or were required because the individual is or was confined to the home, as defined in sections 1835(a) and 1814(a) of the Act, except when receiving outpatient services.

(iii) A plan for furnishing the services has been established and will be or was periodically reviewed by a physician who is a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatric medicine, and who is not precluded from performing this function under paragraph (d) of this section. (A doctor of podiatric medicine may perform only plan of treatment functions that are consistent with the functions he or she is authorized to perform under State law.)

(iv) The services will be or were furnished while the individual was under the care of a physician who is a doctor of medicine, osteopathy, or podiatric medicine.

(v) A face-to-face patient encounter, which is related to the primary reason the patient requires home health services, occurred no more than 90 days prior to the home health start of care date or within 30 days of the start of the home health care and was performed by a physician or allowed non-physician practitioner as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(v)(A) of this section. The certifying physician must also document the date of the encounter as part of the certification.

(A) The face-to-face encounter must be performed by one of the following:

(1) The certifying physician himself or herself.

(2) A physician, with privileges, who cared for the patient in an acute or post-acute care facility from which the patient was directly admitted to home health.

(3) A nurse practitioner or a clinical nurse specialist (as those terms are defined in section 1861(aa)(5) of the Act) who is working in accordance with State law and in collaboration with the certifying physician or in collaboration with an acute or post-acute care physician with privileges who cared for the patient in the acute or post-acute care facility from which the patient was directly admitted to home health.

(4) A certified nurse midwife (as defined in section 1861(gg) of the Act) as authorized by State law, under the supervision of the certifying physician or under the supervision of an acute or post-acute care physician with privileges who cared for the patient in the acute or post-acute care facility from which the patient was directly admitted to home health.

(5) A physician assistant (as defined in section 1861(aa)(5) of the Act) under the supervision of the certifying physician or under the supervision of an acute or post-acute care physician with privileges who cared for the patient in the acute or post-acute care facility from which the patient was directly admitted to home health.

(B) The face-to-face patient encounter may occur through telehealth, in compliance with section 1834(m) of the Act and subject to the list of payable Medicare telehealth services established by the applicable physician fee schedule regulation.

(1) Timing and signature. The certification of need for home health services must be obtained at the time the plan of care is established or as soon thereafter as possible and must be signed and dated by the physician who establishes the plan.

(2) [Reserved]

(2) [Reserved]

(b) Recertification—(1) Timing and signature of recertification. Recertification is required at least every 60 days when there is a need for continuous home health care after an initial 60-day episode. Recertification should occur at the time the plan of care is reviewed, and must be signed and dated by the physician who reviews the plan of care. Recertification is required at least every 60 days unless there is a—

(i) Beneficiary elected transfer; or

(ii) Discharge with goals met and/or no expectation of a return to home health care.

(2) Content and basis of recertification. The recertification statement must indicate the continuing need for services and estimate how much longer the services will be required. Need for occupational therapy may be the basis for continuing services that were initiated because the individual needed skilled nursing care or physical therapy or speech therapy. If a patient’s underlying condition or complication requires a registered nurse to ensure that essential non-skilled care is achieving its purpose, and necessitates a registered nurse be involved in the development, management, and evaluation of a patient’s care plan, the physician will include a brief narrative describing the clinical justification of this need. If the narrative is part of the recertification form, then the narrative must be located immediately prior to the physician’s signature. If the narrative exists as an addendum to the recertification form, in addition to the physician’s signature on the recertification form, the physician must sign immediately following the narrative in the addendum.

(c) Determining patient eligibility for Medicare home health services. Documentation in the certifying physician’s medical records and/or the acute/post-acute care facility’s medical records (if the patient was directly admitted to home health) shall be used as the basis for certification of home health eligibility. This documentation shall be provided upon request to the home health agency, review entities, and/or CMS. Criteria for patient eligibility are described in paragraphs (a)(1) and (b) of this section. If the documentation used as the basis for the certification of eligibility is not sufficient to demonstrate that the patient is or was eligible to receive services under the Medicare home health benefit, payment will not be rendered for home health services provided.

(d) Limitation of the performance of physician certification and plan of care functions. The need for home health services to be provided by an HHA may not be certified or recertified, and a plan of care may not be established and reviewed, by any physician who has a financial relationship as defined in §411.354 of this chapter, with that HHA, unless the physician’s relationship meets one of the exceptions in section 1877 of the Act, which sets forth general exceptions to the referral prohibition related to both ownership/investment and compensation; exceptions to the referral prohibition related to ownership or investment interests; and exceptions to the referral prohibition related to compensation arrangements.

(1) If a physician has a financial relationship as defined in §411.354 of this chapter, with an HHA, the physician may not certify or recertify need for home health services provided by that HHA, establish or review a plan of treatment for such services, or conduct the face-to-face encounter required under sections 1814(a)(2)(C) and 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Act unless the financial relationship meets one of the exceptions set forth in §411.355 through §411.357 of this chapter.

(2) A Nonphysician practitioner may not perform the face-to-face encounter required under sections 1814(a)(2)(C) and 1835(a)(2)(A) of the Act if such encounter would be prohibited under paragraph (d)(1) if the nonphysician practitioner were a physician.

[53 FR 6638, Mar. 2, 1988; 53 FR 12945, Apr. 20, 1988; 56 FR 8845, Mar. 1, 1991, as amended at 65 FR 41211, July 3, 2000; 66 FR 962, Jan. 4, 2001; 70 FR 70334, Nov. 21, 2005; 72 FR 51098, Sept. 5, 2007; 74 FR 58133, Nov. 10, 2009; 75 FR 70463, Nov. 17, 2010; 76 FR 9503, Feb. 18, 2011; 76 FR 68606, Nov. 4, 2011; 77 FR 67163, Nov. 8, 2012; 79 FR 66116, Nov. 6, 2014]

The DIY ZPIC

I have friends who can do just about anything.  Fans of Pinterest, Instructables, and the DIY Network channel can build a boat from water bottles, decorate like Martha Stewart and change out a faulty transmission on their lunch break.  There are Do it Yourself legal forms in case you want to write your own will and computer programs that serve as your personal accountant.  DIY healthcare includes sophisticated diagnostic testing and when you think about it, aren’t fajitas merely a DIY Burrito kit?

Following suit, is the Brand New Amazing Do It Yourself ZPIC from our friends at AdvanceMed.

Here’s how it works:

  1. You are chosen based upon statistical aberrations in your claims pattern.  One agency may be chosen because a certain percentage of patients have been on service for a very long time.  Another may be chosen because of the amount of therapy provided.
  2. A letter arrives in the mail.  It will have the name of a benign sounding company like AdvanceMed or Safeguard Services.  If you live in the Northeast, your Zone Contractor is listed as ‘Under Protest’ which I believe is a reference to the contractual agreement with CMS but wouldn’t that be a cool name for a Zone Contractor?  In spite of outward appearances, this is not junk mail.
  3. It references a list of patients and tells you to perform a review on those patients and assess for eligibility.  One agency had a list attached.  I believe they are the only one.  If you have seen a list, please advise STAT.  You may do so in a confidential email. You may have stumbled upon a rare document worthy of placement in the library of congress under glass.
  4. After completing assessment referenced in step 3, you are asked to send a report to AdvanceMed advising them of your findings along with a check to cover any overpayments.
  5. The letter goes on to strongly suggest that the agency stop everything and complete a 100% review of all records in their agency to assess for any compliance issues.

I regret that I was somewhat high the first time somebody actually read me one of these letters aloud.  The recipient of said letter did not find it as amusing as I did.  I promise to never take a work relating

After the meds wore off, it did occur to me that these letters could be very disturbing to an agency.  What exactly do they mean by a strong suggestion?  I strongly suggest that everyone exercises daily but many people do not and there is no penalty (other than heart attacks, strokes, obesity and diabetes).  I suspect that the Zone’s suggestion carries more weight than mine.  But, I have no way of knowing.

What really amazes me is the clever new reasons given for denials:

  1. No OASIS data found in the state repository
  2. ICD-9 Coding (Not new but the the focus is no longer on Diabetes and hypertension; it is now low vision)
  3. My favorite – the one I wholeheartedly concur with reads as follows:

Quality of care is questionable as the nursing visits were not increased to follow up on elevated blood pressure.

Another denial read the same thing substituting new meds for blood pressure.

If you are the recipient of a similar letter, please feel to call upon us for help.  If your agency does have the time and resources to drop everything and do a complete review of all clinical records, please email us anyway.  I am particularly interested in knowing if you received a list and what statistical aberration you reflect.

If you are not a recipient yet, it may be a good time to review all your validation reports since Jan. 1, 2010 and ensure that OASIS was submitted for all claims prior to billing.  You may also want to rethink your approach to care planning and get out of the 1W9 mode.  For information about coding low vision, check out The Coders blog.

I fully anticipate that the feds will be mailing letters to suspected drug lords asking them to perform a complete search of their home and report back with an inventory so that a sentence can be arranged.  I draw the line at DIY dentistry, though.

UA-37163302-1

%d bloggers like this: