Foot Assessment Tutorial
February 17, 2012
It is not my style to knock the advice given by the American Diabetic Association, Podiatrists, the Lower Extremity Amputation Prevention Program or all of those other so-called experts who teach foot exams. I certainly buy into their position that assessing feet is important for so many reasons but I find that their instructions are incomplete. In response, Haydel Consulting Services, LLC has stepped up to the plate to provide you with the missing pieces for a complete foot exam. Pay close attention. The skills you learn could save a limb or a life.
- Start with a foot encased in a shoe and sock. Take a look at the shoe to make sure it is appropriate for the patient and fits well. High heels, flip flops and all the other really cool kinds of shoes are not appropriate for many of our elderly patients. No matter how ugly the shoe is, do not criticize the patient’s choice of footwear if the shoes meet the above criteria.
- Untie the shoe. This may add some time to your visit but it will definitely make it easier to complete the following steps.
- Gently ease the shoe off the foot. Do not pull, tug or otherwise force the shoe off to prevent the foot from coming off with the shoe.
- Inch the sock down from the top towards the toes until the entire foot is visible. DO NOT ATTEMPT STEP 4 UNTIL STEPS 1 – 3 ARE COMPLETE.
- Attentively assess the foot according to the incomplete guidelines published by above referenced agencies. Notice how the nurse in this photo (Susie Soskin, RN) is at eye level with the foot. If you cannot get down to eye level, find someone who can or get the patient to lay down in the bed. If your knees are too old to bend down then chances are your vision is not good enough to assess feet from a distance.
- These are perfect feet. I know this because they belong to my son. I have bought hundreds of shoes for these size elevens. At the cash register, I have often been a bit overwhelmed at the cost of keeping him in shoes. After taking care of a few amputees, I am honored to have had the privilege to buy full pairs of shoes for him. I hope when I am dead and gone, he still has to pay for a full pair.
A high resolution copy of the above tutorial is available by clicking here. Please feel free to print it, share it or ignore it. And yes, I know the vast majority of us do take shoes and socks off every visit and look at diabetic feet. This is good but diabetics are not the only patients who benefit from foot assessments. Patients with heart failure or take diuretics will show signs of fluid build up in their feet, compromised circulation from cardiovascular or other disease can result in discoloration or stasis ulcers and injuries to the feet can be overlooked by any patient with loss of sensation or callused skin.
So, if this helps you to remember, all is well. If you don’t need reminding, kudos to you. If you think that one of your nurses or coworkers is not taking the time to do a complete foot assessment, draw a happy face on the bottom of the foot and see what shows up in the documentation:)
As always, questions and comments are welcome below or via email. As so on…..
Getting Paid
January 30, 2012
I see a lot of denials in my job. Some (actually a lot) are legitimate because the agency hasn’t complied with one or more regulations. I have also seen an alarming rate of denials that cause me to question the competence of those performing the reviews.
Last week I received a copy of a denial. It was actually the second denial on the same claim. Palmetto GBA originally denied the claim as they did not think that the Alzheimer’s patient confined to a wheelchair was homebound. My client appealed to Maximus who agreed that the patient was in fact, confined to the home but then denied the claim because there was no documentation of the face to face encounter. The reason my client did not send the documentation is because the episode in question was the second episode and the face to face encounter occurred prior to the first episode.
I am also seeing claims denied because of physician signatures. In some states, my own included, the signature requirement in the minimum standards reads that if the agency documents when the orders were received by the agency, that will suffice as evidence that orders were received timely according to state minimum standards.
The state does not pay your Medicare Claims.
Medicare requires that the physician both sign and DATE his or her signature. Failure to do so will result in a denial.
Statutory Denials
Statutory denials are like free spins on the slot machine for the folks who review ADR’s and other claims. A statutory denial means that the patient was somehow not eligible for services and therefore, nothing is covered. Compare that to a denial because the reviewer did not think that two of the visits were covered. If the total number of visits was greater than 6, then the two non-covered visits will not result in a loss to the agency. If an ICD-9 code is not supported, the payment will be downcoded usually costing the agency a couple of hundred dollars. But if the patient is not homebound, or there is a problem with the physician, or the orders are not signed, the claim is denied in its entirety and no further effort is required by the person doing the review.
Now, if it were me and y’all can thank your higher power it isn’t, I would go for the statutory denials every time. (And I could find them, too.) These are also the easiest to prevent.
Getting Paid
- Everyone in the agency should be aware of the signature requirement. The primary responsibility should lie with the first person who sees the orders whether it is the marketer or the person receiving the mail. However, nobody should see an undated signature without bringing it to the Director’s attention.
- Be obnoxious about dates. Buy some file folder labels and print, ‘Please sign and DATE your signature’ at the bottom of every order. Use red ink. Make it interesting and noticeable. Add a note about dating signatures to your fax cover sheet used for orders.
- Because marketing staff often have more exciting things to discuss, make badges that read: I need a date. That will spark some lively conversations.
- With every ADR that is submitted to your MAC, include the description of homebound status as found in the Medicare Benefits Manual.
- After the patient’s initial episode, ensure that the face to face encounter is included in the summary. That leads me to;
- Write a summary. If your agency is not writing summaries for each episode, begin writing them now. For ADR’s there is nothing wrong about documenting after the fact as long as the documentation is dated on the day that you wrote it.
- If you find an egregious error that cannot be ethically corrected, cancel the claim and send documentation along with your ADR. This won’t affect the outcome but it is the classy thing to do. It also shows that you do know how to recognize errors. Please note that some errors can be corrected ethically. Do not be too hasty in cancelling claims.
- If at all possible, have someone who has not been involved with the patient review the documentation you intend to submit. It is too easy to read between the lines when you know about the patient. The holes are not glaring to you. If you have a branch or if there is an another agency owned by the same organization, trade off ADR’s. If you do not have a sister agency or anyone in your organization, consider using a professional consulting service. I can recommend a good one if you need one.
- Write a cover letter if there are any discrepancies in your documentation. For instance, you may have a very weak patient who progressed to her highest level of functioning with therapy in a prior episode. Note this so the chart does not look as though you have a patient in need of therapy but failed to provide it. (Yes, the reviewer should be able to look at past claims but they should also know homebound status and when the face to face encounter occurs as well.)
- Share your ADR results with your staff. It is so much easier to learn from the errors of others. Too often, agencies don’t want word to get out on the street that they have received a ton of ADR’s. Get over it. ADR’s are being sent out at a rate that might very well save the United States Postal System from financial ruin.
We are always interested in hearing about those strange and somewhat inappropriate denials. Please share with us if you have one that we might teach us all a little something about getting paid. After all, it doesn’t matter how much congress reduces the home health payment if you are never paid.
And as always, we are available to help with ADR’s. We read clinical records as though payment is coming from our own pockets (because it is!) and do our best to get you paid. Mind you, we can only work with what we are given. So, write those summaries and get signatures dated.
Deny, Deny, Deny
January 26, 2012

This horse will likely die of humiliation soon but please don't beat her. Her owners have put her through enough already.
It’s Mandy here. Hope you all had a wonderful holiday.
So, we all know the old saying – Deny, Deny, Deny. Well, apparently that’s what our zone contractors are so anxious to do. They deny claims for the smallest little things like medical necessity. Whoever heard? Wink, Wink.
The truth is, these zone contractors get paid literally millions of dollars for ensuring that claims are paid appropriately. In order to make CMS feel good about al those millions of dollars, they have to offset the payment with a whole lot of denials. I wonder how they sleep at night? Probably, pretty good laying on their big fat wallets.
But it doesn’t stop with the Zone. Apparently, Palmetto and other MACs got jealous at all the attention the Zone contractors were getting and now they are flooding the market with ADR’s. In some cases, the same agencies under a ZPIC audit are also getting ADR’s. How can that be fair? It probably isn’t, but we ain’t changing it so we have to live with it.
Palmetto GBA is so warm and fuzzy; they give us a list of the worst offenses. Here are the most recently listed Top 10 reasons for denial:
- Documentation does not support homebound status.
- Lack of response to ADR.
- Information does not support medical necessity.
- Orders do not cover all visits billed.
- Unable to determine medical necessity b/c appropriate Oasis not submitted.
- Medical review HIPPS code change/Documentation contradict M item/s
- POC/Cert present and signed but not dated
- Dependent services denied because qualifying service was denied.
- Partial denial for therapy resulting in medical review HIPPS code change.
- Order not signed and/or dated timely.
What are we dealing with here? Homebound, medical necessity, we know, we know. Apparently, we don’t. 50% of this list is directly related to documentation. Whether it be our Oasis, our skill, or our therapy notes, can we beat this dead horse anymore?
Attention DON’s and case managers! Calling all nurses and therapists!
Big brother is watching. We can no longer skate by with the minimum. We must provide top notch care with top notch documentation EVERY, SINGLE visit for dwindling reimbursement. What does that mean? Only the best will survive, but we can do it.
Steps to take to alleviate denials:
- Train staff based upon the most current guidelines not outdated belief systems
- Make sure employees understand the definition of homebound status and how to document it on every clinical note, including therapists
- Don’t provide an opportunity for a medical necessity denial
- Actually look at medicines every visit – truly groundbreaking idea
- Develop working relationships with physician offices to open communication
- document all changes to the plan of care
- document all changes in condition
- Ask for changes to the plan of care when necessary.
- Always address caregivers in documentation – preferably by name. Changes in caregiver status affect our patients.
- educate all clinical staff to sign and date notes with a legible signature if you are not using electronic documentation
- Train clerical staff to look for signatures and dates when filing as a double check system
- Establish a follow-up policy for outstanding orders and stick to it. Orders not signed within 30 days are not acceptable. Hand deliver to the physician office if necessary.
- Get a custom stamp that reads: DATE YOUR SIGNATURE or something a little less subtle to put on MD orders and care plans
Everyone makes a few honest mistakes, but more than a few could land you in the slammer. Be careful out there my fellow warriors. Document, document, document! Our nursing instructors were right!!
*Please note: No horses were actually hurt in the writing of this blog and I have never actually spoken to or met a zone contractor employee so I actually cannot vouch for their sleeping arrangements, personal appearances or opinions regarding home health zpic audits. This is only a commentary and represents no actual employees of Zone Contractors.
That Whole Fraud Thing, Again
January 18, 2012
Normally, I do not write much about actual fraud cases because knowing about them does not aff
ect the way good nurses care for patients. I honestly cannot imagine anyone who chooses to be blatantly fraudulent would have an interest in reading my website but who knows? Anyway, I have been following a case in Florida that you might want to keep in mind if you are ever involved with an agency that is not completely above board.
On Jan. 5, three people were sentenced in Miami related to 17M dollars in fraudulent claims being sent to Medicare for home health care nursing and therapy services for patients who were not eligible. This is part of an ongoing legal drama involving multiple patient recruiters, an administrator and a physician being charged or pleading guilty of fraud. Here are the three.
- Lisandra Alonso, 34, was sentenced to 78 months in prison and two years of supervised release and was ordered to pay $15.3 million in restitution.
- Jose Ros, 72, was sentenced to 12 months in prison and three years of supervised release and was ordered to pay $395,000 in restitution.
- Farah Maria Perez, 40, was sentenced to six months in prison and two years of supervised release and was ordered to pay $118,000 in restitution.
Lisandra Alonso was the office manager of ABC home health. In her thirties now, she will be forty when she gets out of jail but then life won’t be so sweet because she will have to somehow come up with 15.3M.
Jose Ros will only go to prison for 12 months but at age 72, that could be a life sentence. I hear prison life ages you. (While I do not approve of patient recruitment, I must admit there is a certain elegance to adding septuagenarians to your marketing team. Kind of wish I had thought of that.)
Farah Perez,40 is the one who really got my attention. Farah is a nurse; just like me and just like most of you.
Now that got my attention. An office manager, a senior citizen and a nurse going to jail. Sadly, Farah is not the first nurse that I have heard of going to jail in recent weeks. It used to be that mostly owners and CEO’s were convicted. Now the rank and files of health care are filling up the prisons.
These three were involved in a scheme where an agency altered clinical records to make people appear to be eligible. In fact, there were records that showed that the patients had impaired vision when they did not or were unable to walk without assistance when they were. In other words, it appears as though they exaggerated the OASIS data in order to increase revenue.
Here’s the kicker. Lisandra, the office manager, was the one who taught the owners and the nurses how to run a fraudulent agency. She emphasized the importance of kickbacks and bribes and taught the nurses how to falsify records.
Nurses, beware. A good office manager is worth their weight in gold. Many have been in homecare long enough to spot certain omissions in clinical records and they are your best friend when it comes to scheduling and payroll. They are perfectly welcome to suggest changes when they see something off kilter. BUT, you do not learn how to take care of patients or document from an office manager.
Anyone who tells you that old people always have pain and impaired vision, is probably right. Look at the OASIS questions. That is not what they ask. You do not apply any blanket answers to questions on the OASIS assessment past the tracking sheet. You assess the patient, you consider the responses, you look them up if you are unsure and then YOU choose the best response.
If you are not satisfied with someone’s advice on how to answer a question, that’s okay. Ask for a reference. I know I do and when nurses ask me to reference something I teach, I am impressed. Those nurses ‘get it’. It doesn’t matter how much they trust me, it is their name on the documentation and unless and until I can prove that I am 100 percent mistake free, I am happy to oblige.
Please don’t let this scare you. Nobody goes to jail for isolated mistakes. On the other hand, it is your responsibility to know the rules and regs pertaining to your position. You cannot claim ignorance if a reasonable person in your position should have known what you did not. For an added layer of protection, call our office to assist you in setting up an effective compliance plan for your agency. But please don’t call unless you are deadly serious about compliance. We do not need clients who aren’t.
Until I achieve the status of 100 percent mistake free, your questions are welcome by posting below or you may email. I’m hoping to achieve mistake free status by June but it might take longer.
Evaluating Employee Evals
January 17, 2012
Pretty much everyone who works is evaluated against certain qualities we desire in employees in addition to the core competencies required for their individual positions. Typically they include knowledge bank, dependability, problem solving skills, communication and teamwork. Scoring is pretty generic as well using a 1 – 5 scale where 1 is poor, 3 is average and 5 is superior. Your agency may do things a little differently but this or something similar is what I see regularly in agencies.
Nobody likes to be average. We like to think we are special and unique and we are. Average simply means that most people are not better or worse in a certain quality or skillset than we are. When talking about nurses, we are, as a group, extremely dependable. Extremely dependable then becomes average. It is the one who suits up and shows up during every crisis and never turns down an extra admit who should get the four or five score.
The example above s what I typically see in agencies. Most employees get fours and fives in almost everything and they get their raise and everyone is happy. The scores of three and below are where attention and resources are devoted to improvement. Realistically, it is difficult to make somebody a better team player or communicate better unless they have a passion to learn what you want to teach.
Here is the same chart with more realistic numbers. Everyone is meeting performance standards except Mary who made too many withdrawals from the knowledge bank. Every employee is above average in at least one area.
Why does this matter? If your goal is to get every employee to score all fives, you will have a homogenous agency with nothing special about it. In fact, if every employee scores a five, it could be said that your agency is average and every score below five is less than average.
You’re employees and their skills are what you sell. Instead of always focusing on what they need to improve to the level of everyone else, would it be better to take the time to find out each individual’s special talents and exploit them?
If you insist on focusing on the weaknesses of an individual, two criteria must be met. The weakness must be so great that it compromises their ability to function in their role and the weakness must be something that can be changed. Asking a chronically shy person to be a better team player or someone who is a little short in the IQ department to perform like an academic is never going to be effective. If the person cannot change and the quality is essential to their job, the person needs to be reassigned to a different position or let go. Or, if the quality is not important to their position, why draw attention someone’s ‘flaw’ that cannot be corrected.
A good manager instead focuses on the individual talents. Instead of getting the average people to perform as well as the top performing individual in an area, he or she will take the people scoring fours and fives and concentrate on talents making them even more valuable to the agency. A great manager will take into consideration even talents that are not work related such as art, writing, calligraphy or music and look for opportunities to exploit them.
We must be standardized in so many areas. There are lines all around us drawn by patient care standards, standardized data sets, billing standards, best practices, etc. that we absolutely must not ignore. Every once in a while, its fun to color outside the lines, or better yet, redraw some lines to make the enclosed space even bigger than it was before.
Or you can work with a bunch of interchangeable drones who are all average in their ability because they do not perform any better or any worse than anyone else in any one area.
Please feel free to email this average nurse if you have any questions or comments but it won’t do any good to point out that my communication skills are sometimes lacking.
