Driving Me Nuts!

February 20, 2012

So, people call me.  They email me.  I get the occasional comment on my blog.  These are the ‘little things’ that make me useful to the home health community.  I am aware of what is going on at the front lines of our industry.  Usually, I can answer questions.  Sometimes, I take a while and look things up.  But sometimes, I get stumped.  that’s when I turn to y’all.

In the past several weeks, I have had calls about two patients.  Both are men.  Both have been referred to clients. The question is the same for both of them.  Do they meet the homebound status requirement?

Patient 1:

This is a man who drives a car.  Not every day but at least weekly.  It is a smaller economy car that gets ideal gas mileage.  I sincerely hope that if this were all that  you knew about the patient that you would declare him ineligible for  services in a heart beat.

However, this gentleman weighs 400 pounds.  He cannot get in the car by himself; nor can he get out of the car by himself.  He just likes to drive and sit by the lake while his wife works.  If he had to, he could drive up to the ER but then someone would have to come and get him out of the car.  Fast food is available as are banks and dry cleaners who offer in car service.  He cannot buy gas unless someone else pumps it for him, go to the MD’s office or outpatient therapy.  In fact, he was at outpatient therapy for a while.  His wife would get him in the car somehow and the therapy employees would get him out.  At some point, it was deemed to dangerous for them to do that in the black asphalt parking lot.

I have a lot of issues with this patient besides homebound status.  Blood clots seem a very real possibility.  It is rumored that he pees in a jar.  I am having a hard time imagining that he can do this without some spillage.  So, now I have immobility, acidic urine and obesity threatening this patient.  I get all that.

But, is he homebound?

Patient 2:

This patient has dementia with episodes of moderate confusion.  Like the patient above they drive.  They are not supposed to drive.  Everyone knows that this is dangerous to the patient and to the community but no one has taken his keys away from him, yet.

Again, I have real issues with this.  If the family is okay with him risking his life, that is up to them.  I am not okay with his risking someone else’s life because they don’t want to take away the car keys.  But it isn’t my feelings that we are assessing here.

I suggested that they approach the MD to get a medical restriction on his license and let him be the bad guy.  But what should happen is again, not the question.

Is this patient homebound?

What do you think?  Email me or comment below.  I will share my thoughts after I hear some of yours.

Foot Assessment Tutorial

February 17, 2012

It is not my style to knock the advice given by the American Diabetic Association, Podiatrists, the Lower Extremity Amputation Prevention Program or all of those other so-called experts who teach foot exams.  I certainly buy into their position that assessing feet is important for so many reasons but I find that their instructions are incomplete.  In response, Haydel Consulting Services, LLC has stepped up to the plate to provide you with the missing pieces for a complete foot exam.  Pay close attention.  The skills you learn could save a limb or a life.

  1. Start with a foot encased in a shoe and sock.  Take a look at the shoe to make sure it is appropriate for the patient and fits well.  High heels, flip flops and all the other really cool kinds of shoes are not appropriate for many of our elderly patients.  No matter how ugly the shoe is, do not criticize the patient’s choice of footwear if the shoes meet the above criteria.
  2. Untie the shoe.  This may add some time to your visit but it will definitely make it easier to complete the following steps.
  3. Gently ease the shoe off the foot.  Do not pull, tug or otherwise force the shoe off to prevent the foot from coming off with the shoe.
  4. Inch the sock down from the top towards the toes until the entire foot is visible.  DO NOT ATTEMPT STEP 4 UNTIL STEPS 1 – 3 ARE COMPLETE.
  5. Attentively assess the foot according to the incomplete guidelines published by above referenced agencies.  Notice how the nurse in this photo (Susie Soskin, RN) is at eye level with the foot.  If you cannot get down to eye level, find someone who can or get the patient to lay down in the bed.  If your knees are too old to bend down then chances are your vision is not good enough to assess feet from a distance.
  6. These are perfect feet.  I know this because they belong to my son.  I have bought hundreds of shoes for these size elevens.  At the cash register, I have often been a bit overwhelmed at the cost of keeping him in shoes.  After taking care of a few amputees, I am honored to have had the privilege to buy full pairs of shoes for him.  I hope when I am dead and gone, he still has to pay for a full pair.

A high resolution copy of the above tutorial is available by clicking here.  Please feel free to print it, share it or ignore it.  And yes, I know the vast majority of us do take shoes and socks off every visit and look at diabetic feet.  This is good but diabetics are not the only patients who benefit from foot assessments.  Patients with heart failure or take diuretics will show signs of fluid build up in their feet, compromised circulation from cardiovascular or other disease can result in discoloration or stasis ulcers and injuries to the feet can be overlooked by any patient with loss of sensation or callused skin.

So, if this helps you to remember, all is well.  If you don’t need reminding, kudos to you.  If you think that one of your nurses or coworkers is not taking the time to do a complete foot assessment, draw a happy face on the bottom of the foot and see what shows  up in the documentation:)

As always, questions and comments are welcome below or via email.  As so on…..

Revalidation

February 7, 2012

Everyone needs validation sometimes. I especially like it when my parking gets validated. Some people need their feelings validated. My driver’s license could use a little revalidation since it has expired and everyone loves a valid credit card. Medicare has also jumped on the validation bandwagon with a new requirement for revalidation 855a’s.

Raise your hand if you have no earthly idea what I am talking about. Good. You can quit reading now unless you own an agency or serve in a managing role. This includes the DON, CFO, Administrator, etc.

As some of you may have figured out by now, CMS has had a little issue with fraud and abuse over the past couple of years. Why just last week two more people in my little town of Baton Rouge were arrested. Many times, these ‘fraudsters’ as the FBI likes to call them, are not much more than shams. When the Feds go to arrest them, they aren’t even there.

So, in an effort to keep track of all their little contractors, CMS is now in the process of sending out letters to all providers asking for same information that would be provided for an agency enrolling as a provider. Furthermore, they are holding agencies to standards that may not have been in place when the agency was initially certified for Medicare.

This is not a complicated process. Any rocket scientist can figure it out. You just fill in the blanks and send it in. You have to pay first on the website. Some folks can even do it online. But if your organization is simple and the ownership structure is fairly normal, it is completely doable.

Here are some things to remember:

  1. Do not send in a revalidation 855 until you are asked. I have a list of all providers who have received a letter. If your mailman is as confused as mine, drop me an email or send me some chocolate and I will look you up.
  2. The ability of contractors to cross reference databases is phenomenal. If you have ever, even tangentially been associated with a person or provider who has been on Medicare’s naughty list, contact your healthcare attorney (or mine) prior to submission of the 855a to determine your risk. Failure to disclose something that Medicare deems relevant is the provider’s equivalent to cyanide.
  3. Go for perfection. All typos will be discovered and brought to your attention as though they were blatant attempts to commit fraud.
  4. Do not ignore your letter. This is not an option or a request from Medicare. If you fail to complete your revalidation 855a, you may very well find yourself unable to bill Medicare, Medicaid and a whole lot of other payor sources.
  5. Know the legal name of your agency. Don’t laugh. You would be surprised how many people do not know the legal name of their agency.
  6. If you are asked to sign a certification page and you do not own the agency, read it very, very carefully. You are signing that you are responsible for all activities within the agency and will ensure that they meet all Medicare Guidelines.

If you need help with your 855a, Alice Posseno, the quiet consultant at Haydel Consulting Services knows more about Medicare enrollment than anyone on the planet. I have no problems renting her out for your project.

Getting Paid

January 30, 2012

I see a lot of denials in my job.  Some (actually a lot) are legitimate because the agency hasn’t complied with one or more regulations.  I have also seen an alarming rate of denials that cause me to question the competence of those performing the reviews.

Last week I received a copy of a denial.  It was actually the second denial on the same claim.  Palmetto GBA originally denied the claim as they did not think that the Alzheimer’s patient confined to a wheelchair was homebound.  My client appealed to Maximus who agreed that the patient was in fact, confined to the home but then denied the claim because there was no documentation of the face to face encounter.  The reason my client did not send the documentation is because the episode in question was the second episode and the face to face encounter occurred prior to the first episode.

I am also seeing claims denied because of physician signatures.  In some states, my own included, the signature requirement in the minimum standards reads that if the agency documents when the orders were received by the agency, that will suffice as evidence that orders were received timely according to state minimum standards.

The state does not pay your Medicare Claims.

Medicare requires that the physician both sign and DATE his or her signature.  Failure to do so will result in a denial.

Statutory Denials

Statutory denials are like free spins on the slot machine for the folks who review ADR’s and other claims.  A statutory denial means that the patient was somehow not eligible for services and therefore, nothing is covered.  Compare that to a denial because the reviewer did not think that two of the visits were covered.  If the total number of visits was greater than 6, then the two non-covered visits will not result in a loss to the agency.  If an ICD-9 code is not supported, the payment will be downcoded usually costing the agency a couple of hundred dollars.  But if the patient is not homebound, or there is a problem with the physician, or the orders are not signed, the claim is denied in its entirety and no further effort is required by the person doing the review.

Now, if it were me and y’all can thank your higher power it isn’t, I would go for the statutory denials every time.  (And I could find them, too.)  These are also the easiest to prevent.

Getting Paid

  1. Everyone in the agency should be aware of the signature requirement.  The primary responsibility should lie with the first person who sees the orders whether it is the marketer or the person receiving the mail.  However, nobody should see an undated signature without bringing it to the Director’s attention.
  2. Be obnoxious about dates.  Buy some file folder labels and print, ‘Please sign and DATE your signature’ at the bottom of every order.  Use red ink.  Make it interesting and noticeable.  Add a note about dating signatures to your fax cover sheet used for orders.
  3. Because marketing staff often have more exciting things to discuss, make badges that read:  I need a date.  That will spark some lively conversations.
  4. With every ADR that is submitted to your MAC, include the description of homebound status as found in the Medicare Benefits Manual.
  5. After the patient’s initial episode, ensure that the face to face encounter is included in the summary. That leads me to;
  6. Write a summary.  If your agency is not writing summaries for each episode, begin writing them now. For ADR’s there is nothing wrong about documenting after the fact as long as the documentation is dated on the day that you wrote it.
  7. If you find an egregious error that cannot be ethically corrected, cancel the claim and send documentation along with your ADR.  This won’t affect the outcome but it is the classy thing to do.  It also shows that you do know how to recognize errors.  Please note that some errors can be corrected ethically.  Do not be too hasty in cancelling claims.
  8. If at all possible, have someone who has not been involved with the patient review the documentation you intend to submit.  It is too easy to read between the lines when you know about the patient.  The holes are not glaring to you.  If you have a branch or if there is an another agency owned by the same organization, trade off ADR’s.  If you do not have a sister agency or anyone in your organization, consider using a professional consulting service.  I can recommend a good one if you need one.
  9. Write a cover letter if there are any discrepancies in your documentation.  For instance, you may have a very weak patient who progressed to her highest level of functioning with therapy in a prior episode.  Note this so the chart does not look as though you have a patient in need of therapy but failed to provide it.  (Yes, the reviewer should be able to look at past claims but they should also know homebound status and when the face to face encounter occurs as well.)
  10. Share your ADR results with your staff.  It is so much easier to learn from the errors of others.  Too often, agencies don’t want word to get out on the street that they have received a ton of ADR’s.  Get over it.  ADR’s are being sent out at a rate that might very well save the United States Postal System from financial ruin.

We are always interested in hearing about those strange and somewhat inappropriate denials.   Please share with us if you have one that we might teach us all a little something about getting paid.  After all, it doesn’t matter how much congress reduces the home health payment if you are never paid.

And as always, we are available to help with ADR’s.  We read clinical records as though payment is coming from our own pockets (because it is!) and do our best to get you paid.  Mind you, we can only work with what we are given.  So, write those summaries and get signatures dated.

Deny, Deny, Deny

January 26, 2012

This horse will likely die of humiliation soon but please don't beat her. Her owners have put her through enough already.

It’s Mandy here.  Hope you all had a wonderful holiday.

So, we all know the old saying – Deny, Deny, Deny.  Well, apparently that’s what our zone contractors are so anxious to do.  They deny claims for the smallest little things like medical necessity. Whoever heard? Wink, Wink.

The truth is, these zone contractors get paid literally millions of dollars for ensuring that claims are paid appropriately. In order to make CMS feel good about al those millions of dollars, they have to offset the payment with a whole lot of denials. I wonder how they sleep at night?  Probably, pretty good laying on their big fat wallets.

But it doesn’t stop with the Zone.  Apparently, Palmetto and other MACs got jealous at all the attention the Zone contractors were getting and now they are flooding the market with ADR’s.  In some cases, the same agencies under a ZPIC audit are also getting ADR’s.  How can that be fair?  It probably isn’t, but we ain’t changing it so we have to live with it.

Palmetto GBA is so warm and fuzzy; they give us a list of the worst offenses.  Here are the most recently listed Top 10 reasons for denial:

    1. Documentation does not support homebound status.
    2. Lack of response to ADR.
    3. Information does not support medical necessity.
    4. Orders do not cover all visits billed.
    5. Unable to determine medical necessity b/c appropriate Oasis not submitted.
    6. Medical review HIPPS code change/Documentation contradict M item/s
    7. POC/Cert present and signed but not dated
    8. Dependent services denied because qualifying service was denied.
    9. Partial denial for therapy resulting in medical review HIPPS code change.
    10. Order not signed and/or dated timely.

What are we dealing with here?  Homebound, medical necessity, we know, we know.  Apparently, we don’t.  50% of this list is directly related to documentation.  Whether it be our Oasis, our skill, or our therapy notes, can we beat this dead horse anymore?

Attention DON’s and case managers! Calling all nurses and therapists! 

Big brother is watching.  We can no longer skate by with the minimum.  We must provide top notch care with top notch documentation EVERY, SINGLE visit for dwindling reimbursement.  What does that mean?  Only the best will survive, but we can do it.

Steps to take to alleviate denials:

  • Train staff based upon the most current guidelines not outdated belief systems
  • Make sure employees understand the definition of homebound status and how to document  it on every clinical note, including therapists
  • Don’t provide an opportunity for a medical necessity denial
    • Actually look at medicines every visit – truly groundbreaking idea
    • Develop working relationships with physician offices to open communication
    • document all changes to the plan of care
    • document all changes in condition
    • Ask for changes to the plan of care when necessary.
    • Always address caregivers in documentation – preferably by name.  Changes in caregiver status affect our patients.
    • educate all clinical staff to sign and date notes with a legible signature if you are not using electronic documentation
  • Train clerical staff to look for signatures and dates when filing as a double check system
  • Establish a follow-up policy for outstanding orders and stick to it.  Orders not signed within 30 days are not acceptable.  Hand deliver to the physician office if necessary.
  • Get a custom stamp that reads:  DATE YOUR SIGNATURE or something a little less subtle to put on MD orders and care plans

Everyone makes a few honest mistakes, but more than a few could land you in the slammer.    Be careful out there my fellow warriors.  Document, document, document!  Our nursing instructors were right!!

*Please note: No horses were actually hurt in the writing of this blog and I have never actually spoken to or met a zone contractor employee so I actually cannot vouch for their sleeping arrangements, personal appearances or opinions regarding home health zpic audits.  This is only a commentary and represents no actual employees of Zone Contractors.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 262 other followers