If you want a Medicare facility, there are numerous questions that must be answered prior to beginning your project. First of all, who is going to own it? Chances are you will not. A good lawyer can assist in determining an ownership structure. As a general rule, I find it messy to have more than one provider number owned by a single entity. And the way around that is to create a separate entity to own any new provider numbers. You can even have existing entities be members of new entities for the sake of simplicity.

So, you are likely establishing a new entity. A tax ID number will be necessary to complete the remainder of the process so get one. It can be done online so you will have it handy for completion of applications. However, prior to submitting the application to Medicare, you must have written confirmation on IRS letterhead of your new Tax ID number. This can take a couple of weeks.

So, you have an entity that own the provider and a tax ID. Now it’s time to decide how you will actually procure your Medicare provider. Beware, any avenue you choose will cost you money. You must have an adequate budget to continue.

If you choose to buy an established facility, the process is generally faster. In the current regulatory world, CMS is authorizing no initial certification surveys. However, in order to buy an existing provider you must assume their provider agreement. That means that any outstanding overpayments are the new providers whether or not they are known at the time of purchase or not. Most lawyers will advise that certain amount of the sale price be put into an escrow account for a period of time to cover losses incurred as the result of prior ownership. The amount of money is often a hot topic of negotiation and even high dollar amounts may not offer full protection. Make no mistake; assumption of an existing provider number is a risk.

In business in general, there will always be risks. The key to risk taking in the Medicare world is to get as much information as you can in order to determine if the purchase falls within your acceptable level of risk. You do this by thorough clinical and financial due diligence. A good due diligence team costs money but can save your sanity in the long run. I have known buyers to get into a home health agency and find that most of the patients do not meet payment guidelines. Not only must they discharge the patients but since the price was dependent on prior documented revenue, it stands to reason that they greatly overpaid for the agency. Add to that the risk incurred if ever the provider number is investigated. The cost of a good due diligence team is small compared to the headaches and financial disasters it can save.

The other advantage of assuming a provider number as opposed to a full upstart is that billable services commence on the day of the transaction. Notice I did not say that billing would begin. In order to bill as the new owner, the entire change of ownership process must be complete at the state and CMS level. But that doesn’t mean that you can’t get paid. Again, with the assistance of a Medicare attorney, a ‘remittance agreement’ should be signed by both parties. This allows billing to continue uninterrupted by the seller with the money being transferred to the new owner.

If your pockets are deep, your tolerance for risk is low and you have unlimited patience, it may be a better idea to create an entity and apply for a brand new provider number. However, this process takes about six months or longer. Services are billable from the date of the certification survey which Medicare will no longer provide. Therefore you must pay an accrediting organization to complete a deemed status survey which Medicare will recognize. So, effective the last day of the survey, assuming it is a good survey, the provider begins to provide billable services. Several weeks to several months later, you will be able bill retrospective to the date of survey. This is painful for anyone but tight budgets make it almost impossible.

There is still a third way to assume a provider. It is the simplest which translates into the highest risk route. When an entity such as a corporation or an LLC changes out members, it is not recognized as a change of ownership for Medicare purposes. If XYZ Hospital, Inc. sells all of its stock to Joe Bleaux, Joe is not considered the new owner. XYX, Inc. continues to own the provider. The same principle applies to LLCs when members are changed out.

This is a particularly high risk transaction because the new members or stockholders are assuming all debts and liabilities of the prior owner in addition to the provider agreement. On the other hand, it only involves filing a couple of documents with the Secretary of State’s office and then notifying CMS and your state office of the changes. It does not interrupt billing. If the provider you are wanting to assume is new with very little history and if you perform exceptional due diligence, this is a simple option.

Of course, now that you have determined who owns your new business and how you will obtain it, the work is just beginning. Within the next couple of weeks, I will post an outline of the steps required. However, if you are anxious to get started now, please email us. We love Medicare Changes of Ownership!

 

Homebound Documentation

July 12, 2010

Last week, I wrote about homebound status and I am assuming that all my readers have mastered the nuances of homebound status (even though I am still on the fence about some). But knowing your patient is homebound isn’t enough to warrant payment from Medicare and other payor sources that insist your patients be homebound. You must document it.

Bad Documentation Good Documentation
Patient SOB with exertion (Hint: even triathletes get short winded in their fifth hour.) Patient is unable to walk greater than twenty feet without rest period
Patient requires assist devices to leave home. (Does my car count as assist device?) Patient unable to ambulate without walker and requires assistance to place walker in daughters car. Cannot use public transportation.
Leaving home medically contraindicated. Patient at great risk for infection due to compromised immune system secondary to chemotherapy.
Patient unsafe to leave home due to psychiatric reasons. Patient has history of wandering into oncoming traffic. OR, patient oriented times 2.
Patient unable to drive. Physically unable to drive due to arthritis pain in hands.
Homebound due to pain in joints Patient cannot stand for greater than ten minutes due to pain in hips/knees.
Homebound due to no car Can’t help you there
Homebound due to wounds Wounds to lower extremities at great risk for infection when patient leaves home.

Reading carefully, skillful documentation of homebound status is generally speaking much longer than a simple statement. While the statements in the ‘bad’ column may actually state the homebound reason, they do not offer enough information for a third party reviewer to make an independent determination of homebound status.

As someone who reviews clinical records, I become very interested in homebound status when the following findings are evident on the clinical record:

  • Multiple missed visit reports
  • Any missed visit reports without explanation
  • A functional score of F1 or F2. If a patient can bathe, toilet, and dress themselves and require little or no assistance ambulating and transferring, why can’t they leave the house?
  • Multiple documented absences from the home regardless of where the patient went.

Again, if you look at the jobs of RACs, PSCs, and ZPICs, it is far easier to deny an entire clinical record because the patient isn’t homebound rather than read each and every note and determine if the skills are billable in the context of the patient record. If I were paid for each time homebound status was questionable, I wouldn’t be writing this blog. I would be retired and playing bingo somewhere.

I’ll be honest with my faithful readers. It requires a considerable and taxing effort for me to leave my home. Sometimes, I even need the assistance of another person to carry my computer, suitcase, etc. if I am leaving town to visit a client. In the heat of the summer, I clearly do not tolerate it well. You can just look at me in the near 100 degree temp wilting and know that it was a major event for me to leave my house. Yes, indeed. Some might even say I meet the Medicare homebound standards.

But, obviously, I do not. And that’s okay because nobody is billing for services provided to me in my residence. But do your patients truly meet the homebound criteria?

There are patients who are bedbound and those you discharge because they drove in behind you when you were making a visit. Everyone else is in a grey area.

Medicare expects that most times when a patient leaves the home it will be for the purpose of receiving medical treatment. Attending worship services is also acceptable under the home bound criteria. Other than those instances, Medicare does allow occasional and infrequent absences for the purposes of socialization, etc. A patient who shops with their daughter a couple of times a month may not violate the homebound criteria. And if they take an occasional walk around the block and go get their hair done, they can still be considered homebound. But what about the patient who shops on Monday, walks on Tuesdays and Thursdays and gets their hair done on Fridays?

When establishing the homebound criteria for patients, we are acting as advocates as patients. We know that patients need services and we try to fit the activities of their daily lives into a vague and inexact definition given to us by CMS. Now pretend you are a surveyor working to prove the patient isn’t homebound. What questions would you ask?

  1. How often do you leave home?
  2. What do you do when you leave home?
  3. Is it difficult for you when you leave home?
  4. Has anyone told you that you must stay home if you want to receive your home health services?

These are the questions I would ask. And the answers will not eliminate all confusion. For instance, what about the patient who walks to the corner every day to buy fast food because his kitchen appliances are malfunctioning and there is no one else to go buy him food? What about the patient who lives in a rural area without a car and there is no public transportation? What happens when the patient is too proud to allow family members to drive him to church on Sundays or if the near blind dialysis patient who drives herself to dialysis occasionally when her family doesn’t show up to take her?

There are no easy answers to these questions. Without interviewing the patient to gather all facts, it is impossible to confidently state that any of the above patients are homebound. But beware. There is more than one agency looking to deny your claims because patients are not meeting the home bound criteria.

We are available for clinical review should you need an outside opinion on the homebound status of your patients. Please feel free to call 225-253-4876 or email us if you need assistance.

If you ask a home health nurse why he or she needs to examine the feet of all diabetic patients, the answer is usually, ‘Because OASIS C investigates our processes’. That much is true. But there is so much more to the story.

  • Each year, 1% to 4% of diabetic patients will develop a foot ulcer
  • In the course of a lifetime, 25% percent of diabetic patients will develop a diabetic foot ulcer
  • 15% of patients with a diabetic foot ulcer will develop osteomylitis
  • Diabetic foot ulcers hurt and can vastly affect the quality of life of patients
  • The cost of treating a diabetic foot ulcer averages over $45,000.00.

All of this information and more can be found here at the Ostomy Wound Management website.

One of my clients intent on ensuring that every diabetic had their feet checked on every visit created this colorful poster for the office. Shannon Barrillieaux generously shares her poster with us here. To download it for your agency’s use, please see link on the right hand sidebar under ‘essential links’.